A data set that contains a subset of the voter mobilzation field experiment analyzed in Gerber and Green (2000).

Format

A data frame with 7865 observations and 6 variables:

ward

ward of the residence.

turnout_98

indicator variable for voting in the 1998 general election.

inperson

indicator variable for if the respondent received in-person canvassing.

phone

indicator variable for if the respondent received phone canvassing.

inperson_rand

indicator variable for if the respondent was randomized to receive in-person canvassing.

phone_rand

indicator variable for if the respondent was randomized to receive phone canvassing.

age

respondent age.

maj_party

indicator variable for if the respondent is a registered Democrat or Republican.

turnout_96

indicator variable for whether or not the respondent voted in the 1996 general election.

Source

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/Q6CID7

Details

Data was cleaned and used in Bowers and Hansen (2009). It was a 2x2 factorial design with noncompliance on both factors. This is the subset of the subjects who lived in a single-person household and were not randomized to receive get-out-the-vote mailers. Blackwell (2017) analyzed the full data adjusting for noncompliance.

References

Gerber, Alan S., and Donald P. Green. “The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment.” The American Political Science Review 94, no. 3 (2000): 653. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585837.

Hansen, Ben B., and Jake Bowers. “Attributing Effects to a Cluster-Randomized Get-Out-the-Vote Campaign.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 104, no. 487 (2009): 873–85. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.ap06589.

Blackwell, Matthew. “Instrumental Variable Methods for Conditional Effects and Causal Interaction in Voter Mobilization Experiments.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 112, no. 518 (2017): 590–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1246363.